International regulatory news in brief

This post covers international regulatory news in brief. It is updated on an ad hoc basis.

For ease of navigation, a tab has been added for each region/topic (below). Each tab includes the date for most recent update under that particular tab. Click on the respective tab to view the news for that region/topic.

Turkey
4 September
Updated guideline on biosimilar products

The “Guideline on Biosimilar Medicinal Products”, which defines the concept of biosimilar medicinal products and determines the general principles to be applied in the licensing of these products, has been updated and published in line with administrative requirements and scientific developments. You can view Revision 3 of 2 Sept 2024 here.

Source: TITCK


29 August
Guideline on Scheduling Processes for Licensing Applications for Medicinal Products for Human Use

This guide which determines the procedures and principles regarding the scheduling processes for applications for human medicinal products that are deemed appropriate after a preliminary evaluation as a result of the examination carried out by the Agency among the human medicinal product licensing applications made to the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency, has been updated and published in line with administrative requirements.

You can view it here.

Source: TITCK

5 August
Uploading of corrected documents once deficiencies have been identified following first evaluation of licence application for Human Medicinal Products

Currently, for deficiencies identified in the first evaluation of the licence applications for Human Medicinal Products by the Preliminary Examination (CTD) Unit, all modules in the corrected application have to be uploaded to the system again from KİOSK.

  • From 8 August 2024, this will change so that only the PDF documents with the deficiencies must be uploaded from KİOSK.
  • Any PDF documents other than those notified in the deficiency letter must not be uploaded without being specified in the corrected application cover letter.

Source: TITCK

30 July
Updated Guide on the Working Procedures and Principles of the Medicinal Products for Human Use Priority Assessment Board

This guide which determines the procedures and principles concerning prioritization applications made to the Turkish Medicines and Medical Devices Agency and the work of the Medicinal Products for Human Use Priority Assessment Board established within the Agency, has been updated and published. You can view/download the updated guide here.

Source: TITCK

3 July
Updated Guide on Cases Requiring Re-licensing of Licensed Human Medicinal Products

Revision 1 (1 July 2024) of the above guideline which determines the principles and details concerning license transfers, lost license issuance and transition to certified license for licensed human medicinal products for human use licensed in accordance with the “Regulation on the Licensing of Medicinal Products for Human Use” has been published.

You can view/download it via the link below.

Source: TITCK


1 September
Electronic data sets from pivotal bioequivalence studies

From 1 September 2024, Swissmedic is accepting electronic data sets from pivotal bioequivalence studies for applications for new authorisation of human medicinal products with known active substances without innovation.

  • This option is restricted to bioequivalence studies with a two-way, three-way or four-way crossover design.
  • Submission of these electronic data sets enables Swissmedic to analyse data effectively and efficiently using the latest state of science and technology.
  • Swissmedic does not require any additional data, but only recommends submitting the data in a standardised electronic format.
  • Submission is not mandatory and Swissmedic will continue to base its decisions on study reports in PDF format.
  • Section 6.5 Data sets relating to studies has accordingly been added to the form New authorisation of human medicinal products and section 6.5.2 Pharmacokinetic bridging has been revised in the guidance document Authorisation of human medicinal product with known active substance.
  • Further information on the technical requirements regarding data sets are set out in Annex 9.3 of the guidance document Authorisation of human medicinal product with known active substance.
  • The revised specification documents are valid as of 1 September 2024.

Source: Swissmedic


Mobile technologies – Submission of films as additional information regarding the safety, efficacy and quality of medicinal products
  • From 1 September 2024, Swissmedic will be accepting the submission of films as part of the authorisation of QR codes
  • The guidance document Mobile technologies stipulates the options for applying QR codes. The QR code can direct to a training/instructional film as additional information. In addition to the film script, the film can now also be uploaded directly via the portal with the application to apply a QR code.
  • The document Form Mobile technologies has been revised accordingly. See section 5.2
  • The revised specification document is valid with effect from 1 September 2024.
  • The technical requirements for transmitting the films are outlined in the linked publication Submission of accompanying documentation for applications for authorisation and variation for human medicinal products.

Source: Swissmedic


SEND data sets for new authorisation applications for human medicinal products with new active substances

From 1 September 2024, Swissmedic is accepting SEND (Standard for the Exchange of Nonclinical Data) data sets for applications for new authorisation for human medicinal products with new active substances.

  • SEND (Standard for the Exchange of Nonclinical Data) is a data format for preclinical studies that enables assessors, among others, to visualise the results of these studies.
  • The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) requires the submission of SEND data for new authorisations according to their specifications in the Data Standards Catalog dated April 2024.
  • From 1 September 2024 data in SEND format can be submitted to Swissmedic for new authorisation applications for human medicinal products with new active substances.
  • This will be particularly useful for applications for which the preclinical data has already been produced in SEND format for submission to the US FDA. Swissmedic does not require any additional data.
  • Swissmedic will continue to base its decisions primarily on the underlying study reports in PDF format. However, the use of SEND data sets enables effective and efficient analysis of data according to the latest state of science and technology.
  • In connection with the new options for submitting electronic data, Section 6.5 Data sets relating to studies has been added to the form New authorisation of human medicinal products and section 5.2.4 Non-clinical documentation (Module 4) has been revised accordingly in the updated guidance document Authorisation of human medicinal product with new active substance.
  • Also available is a Form New authorisation of human medicinal products 

Source: Swissmedic


Combined studies: New forms and a new information sheet for submissions to Swissmedic

A clinical trial of medicinal products/advanced therapy medicinal products may be conducted in parallel with a clinical investigation of medical devices/an interventional performance study of in vitro diagnostics. In this case, requirements for the different types of research apply in full.


New forms and a new information sheet are now available to facilitate submissions to Swissmedic. Further information combined studies is available here.

Source: Swissmedic


Changes to the guidance document ‘Time limits for authorisation applications’

Following receipt of an application, Swissmedic checks the formal aspects of the application in the “Formal control and technical validation” phase.

  • If the documentation for the application is complete and formally correct, the application is formally accepted as valid (“Doc. OK” milestone). If there are formal shortcomings in the application documentation, however, Swissmedic sends a formal objection to the applicant.
  • Previously, written notification of achieving the “Doc. OK” milestone was given for applications for human medicinal products if there had been a prior formal objection.
  • In future, there will be no correspondence on achievement of the “Doc. OK” milestone.
  • Following a formal objection, the period stated in the guidance document Time limits for authorisation applications is available again to Swissmedic to recheck that the documentation is formally complete. After expiry of this time limit, the “Doc. OK” milestone is deemed to have been achieved.
  • For applicants using the Swissmedic Portal, completion of the “Doc. OK” milestone will continue to be visible in the Swissmedic Portal.
  • The guidance document Time limits for authorisation applications has been amended accordingly and other formal aspects have been revised.
  • The new practice and the revised guidance document Time limits for authorisation applications came into effect on 1 September 2024.

Source: Swissmedic

26 August
Responsible Person: requirements (I-SMI.TI.17e)

An updated of technical interpretation 17 ‘Responsible Person: requirements’ has been published.

  • For the inspectorates, to whom all technical interpretations are primarily addressed, the technical interpretation applies with immediate effect, as always in such cases.
  • Numerous clarifications have been made in the new version.
  • In most cases, compliance with the previous technical interpretation also guarantees compliance with the current version. In the few situations in which this is not the case, the licence holder is generally required to adapt immediately.
  • Chapter 5.5 requires a good knowledge of the local language for the responsible person.
  • Establishment licence holders whose already approved responsible person does not meet these requirements are given a period of 12 months from the date of publication of the updated technical interpretation to make the necessary adjustments, either by appointing a new responsible person with the required language skills or by ensuring that the responsible person acquires the required language skills within this period.

Source: Swissmedic

25 July
Benchmarking study 2023 – International comparison of Swiss registration times

Swissmedic and the Swiss pharmaceutical associations (ASSGP, Intergenerika, Interpharma, scienceindustries, vips) have conducted a benchmarking study (for the 11th time) that analyses the approval times for human medicines in Switzerland and compares them with the approval times of the EMA and the US FDA.

The applications from participating marketing authorization holders included in the study cover 78.9% of the total Swiss market and 83.9% of the market for prescription drugs.

The analysis is based on:

  • new applications for new active substances (NA NAS),
  • indication extensions (IE) and
  • procedures for known active substances (BWS).

The results serve as a factual basis for the ongoing dialogue between Swissmedic and the pharmaceutical industry. They help to identify and implement improvements in the approval processes for human medicines.

Compared to the previous year, the processing times of the Swissmedic approval procedures were as foolws:

Swissmedic Application processing times for NA NAS and IE applications

The study found that:

  • NA NAS applications in the standard procedure had increased processing times (+15%); the effect was particularly pronounced in the subgroup of orphan drugs due to a high proportion of text review rounds (+72%).
  • No significant changes were observed in the IE applications.
  • There were significantly reduced processing times for NA NAS applications in the Orbis A procedure and according to Art. 13 HMG, which were 28% and 24% shorter respectively than in the previous year.

Swissmedic, EMA and FDA approvals

  • Compared to the EMA, Swissmedic was 11% slower for NA NAS applications (all procedures) and 19% slower for IE applications (all procedures).
    • The FDA continued to be significantly faster than Swissmedic: processing times were 31% shorter for NA NAS (all procedures) and 48% shorter for IE (all procedures). 

Submission and approvals gap compared to the EMA and the FDA

  • The submission gap and the approval gap with the reference authorities EMA and FDA generally increased compared to the previous year.
  • Exceptions were NA NAS applications in the standard procedure, which had shorter submission and approval gaps with both the EMA and the FDA compared to the previous year.

Swissmedic processing times for BWS applications

  • In the case of BWS, the processing times for BWS without innovation (generics) in the standard procedure are slightly longer than in the EU.
  • In cases in which the procedure according to Art. 13 TMG was applied, the processing time could be shortened compared to the standard procedure.

Labelling phase text review times

In the labelling phase, the proportion of applications with text review rounds increased overall from 20% to 28%, most significantly for BWS (from 14% to 25%).

Further trends and findings from the study are summarized in the Executive Summary.

Source: Swissmedic

2 July
Adaptation of the forms for new authorisation of human medicinal products or changes and extensions of authorisation HAM

Both forms below have been updated and can be viewed at the links provided.

Both forms are valid from 1 July 2024.

With reference to the forms:

  • Within 60 days of receipt of a complete application for authorisation, for an extension of the indication or for an extension of the authorisation of a medicinal product, Swissmedic publishes various pieces of information on the application.
  • The required information on the indication will be published by Swissmedic unchanged as provided by the applicants in either form.
  • Swissmedic has determined that the level of detail of this information varies greatly and that the information content is insufficient in some cases.
  •  In order to ensure that the public is adequately informed, Chapter 1 Basic information on the form specifies how the indication should be described. In future, applicants will be required to provide either the requested indication wording or a summary with the following information for the indication requested in an application:
    • Specification of the disease (molecular subtype if applicable)
    • Target population
    • Line specification (if applicable)
    • Specification of type of previous therapies (if applicable)
    • Specification whether monotherapy or in combination with other active substances (if applicable)
  • If applicants invoke trade secrets when formulating the area of ​​application, the cumulative, case-specific requirements apply (see explanations in the WL SwissPAR ), which Swissmedic checks for legality.
  • Additionally, Swissmedic has simplified the consent to the exchange of information with partner authorities in the two forms mentioned (Chapter 7.7 and 6.8 respectively) and deleted Chapter 7.8 and 6.9 respectively, since Covid-19 Ordinance 3 (SR 818.101.24) will expire at the end of June 2024.

Source: Swissmedic

1 July

At a meeting of Swissmedic’s Agency Council on 26 April 2024 following the conclusion of the consultative process involving subject-matter experts and official bodies, it was decided that the following annexes to TPLRO and TPLO should be amended with effect from 1 July 2024:

  • Annex 3a TPLRO Pharmaceutical excipients of particular interest,
  • Annex 3 TPLO Medicinal products and medicinal product groups with a manufacturing process subject to mandatory authorisation.

Source: Swissmedic

17 June
Changes to declaration of goods for the export of medicinal products (including clinical trials) and narcotics made to the Federal Office for Customs and Border Security (FOCBS)

On 17 March 2024, the Federal Office for Customs and Border Security (FOCBS) introduced the new Passar goods traffic system for exports.

  • As of 17 March 2024, additional attributes (provided on this page) must be entered when declaring narcotics in the Passar system:
  • For medicines, effective 4 November 2024, when declaring goods, the applicant must indicate the restriction/licence requirement in the Passar system and enter the number of the establishment licence as well as the licence holder.
  • The procedure applies to the export of ATMPs (such as CAR T cells or other tissue products) that are exported to foreign countries as non-ready-to-use medicinal products, processed there, and subsequently reimported into Switzerland as a finished product. Effective 4 November 2024, for declaration in the Passar system, information must be entered regarding the clinical trial (Restriction code 511 SMC – Medicinal products, clinical trials, UID, licence number).
  • During the transition phase until 31 December 2025, export customs declarations can be submitted either in the e-dec or Passar system.
  • Passar is scheduled for rollout for imports starting Q3/25 (Roadmap Passar 2.0 (Einfuhr) (admin.ch)) [information in DE, FR and IT only]. Information on the import of medicinal products, narcotics and clinical trials will be published in due course on the Swissmedic website.
  • Effective 1 January 2026, only the Passar goods traffic system can be used.
  • There will be changes in the declaration process for medicinal products and narcotics for export. In future, additional attributes must be entered into the Passar system for both types of product.

Further information is available at the link below.

Source: Swissmedic

15 June
Simplification of requirements for renewed authorisation of medicinal products

The first authorisation of a medicinal product is usually valid for a period of five years (Art. 16 para. 2 TPA, SR 812.21).

  • Five years after first authorisation, the authorisation holder must submit a once-only application for renewal of authorisation.
  • If the authorisation holder misses the deadline for submission of the application for renewal of authorisation, there is the option of submitting an application for renewed authorisation in order to still maintain authorisation.
  • Swissmedic has simplified the requirements for the application for renewed authorisation.
  • It is now sufficient to send a cover letter confirming that the documentation, including all additions approved since, is identical to that of the authorised medicinal product for which the renewed authorisation application is being submitted and complies with the requirements of therapeutic legislation.
  • Other documents from Module 1 and scientific documentation (Modules 2–5) are now no longer required.
  • The revised Guidance document and updated Directory are valid with effect from 15 June 2024.
  • The Guidance document Renewal and discontinuation of authorisation or change of status (main authorisation/export licence) (ZL201_00_001) has been revised accordingly and the Directory Overview of documents to be submitted (ZL000_00_006) has been updated.

Source: Swissmedic

4 June
Swiss Public Assessment Report (SwissPAR) survey

Since the revision of the Therapeutic Products Act in 2019, Swissmedic has published additional information on medicinal products, including the Swiss Public Assessment Report (SwissPAR).

  • The SwissPAR summarises Swissmedic’s approval decisions on human medicinal products with new active ingredients. 
  • 5 years after the introduction of the SwissPAR, Swissmedic would like to know whether it meets the expectations of readers and where there is potential for improvement.
  • The SwissPAR is aimed at a broad readership, your feedback is important to Swissmedic.

Participation is anonymous and takes about 5 minutes. You can participate in the survey here.

Source: Swissmedic

29 August
MHRA consultation on statutory fees – proposals on ongoing cost recovery

The MHRA is seeking views from interested stakeholders on proposals to update its statutory fees to ensure they continue to recover their costs.

Views are sought on the following proposals:  

  • Increasing the statutory fees shown in its consultation document to ensure continued cost-recovery until 2027. 
  • Amending the existing Medical Device Registration fee to include the costs for medical device post-market work.  
  • Creating a new service providing regulatory advice meetings for medical devices.  
  • Amending the fee model for three existing services, as well as increasing the fees to ensure continued cost-recovery until 2027, and also to remove 51 fees that are no longer in use.  
  • Updating and clarifying the legal definition of a “standard variation” application for homeopathic products. The “standard variation” application statutory fee for homeopathic products will be unchanged.

The implementation date for these proposed changes is April 2025.

You can respond to the consultation via this link.

Consultation start date: 29 August 2024

Consultation end date: 24 October 2024

Source: MHRA

27 August
Updated guidance: Clinical trials for medicines: apply for authorisation in the UK

This guidance has been updated to amend IVD text on clinical trial/investigation webpages. No further specifics have been provided by the MHRA.

Source: MHRA

19 August
Guidance updated: Apply for the early access to medicines scheme (EAMS)

This guidance has been updated with the addition of more EAMS Scientific Opinion submission dates. See link below.

Source: MHRA

13 August
Guidance: Pre-submission Advice & Support

The UK MHRA offers a pre-submission service before applying for medicines Marketing Authorisations.

  • This service aims to provide the best support possible for prospective applicants, whichever application route is chosen.
  • Pre-submission advice is a service that provides stakeholders with the means to understand how the process of compiling and submitting applications and supporting evidence applies for their product/s. It is distinct from MHRAs Scientific Advice offering.
For International recognition
For New Active Substances and/or complex applications
  • Companies intending to submit Marketing Authorisation Applications for New Active Substances and/or Biological products must request a pre-submission meeting with the relevant teams at-least 3 months prior to the intended application date.
  • This can be done by downloading the Pre-submission Advice Form completing and and returning it to presubmission@mhra.gov.uk.
  • If there are any questions or queries on the above document/s and process, please direct these to presubmission@mhra.gov.uk.

Source: MHRA

9 July
International Recognition Procedure

The MHRA has posted the following update:

‘Updated International Recognition Procedure and eCTD guidance’ on its website.

No further information has been provided.

Source: MHRA

5 September
AEMPS enables a new procedure to present suergrouping for variations of medicines authorized by the national procedure

AEMPS has enabled a new procedure that establishes the possibility of submitting several modifications to marketing authorisations for medicines at the same time in a single application.

  • This procedure has been established in accordance with current regulations (Commission Regulation (EC) No 712/2012) and may be applied provided that the medicines are from the same authorisation holder (TAC) and have been authorised by a national procedure.
  • With its implementation, the AEMPS also eliminates the procedure for prior confirmation of the supergroup application proposal.
  • Companies wishing to use this procedure must verify and justify that they comply with the definition of supergrouping of variations and formally submit it to the Agency for acceptance once it has been evaluated.
  • All information about the requirements for applying for this procedure is available on the AEMPS website and in the instructions for applying for supergrouping of variations for medicines authorised by national procedure.
  • Supergrouping application proposals sent to the AEMPS that have not been confirmed must follow this new procedure.

Source: AEMPS

3 September
Two new AIFA guidelines

AIFA has approved the following two guidelines, providing clarifications with respect to the current European and national legislation and also adapting the Italian context to the EU Regulations.

  • Guidelines for the classification and conduct of observational studies
  • Guidelines for simplification and decentralization of clinical trials 

Source: AIFA

21 August
Guideline for the classification and conduct of observational studies on medicines

AIFA has published the Guideline for the classification and conduct of observational studies as part of the Italian legislation to comply with the requirements of Regulation (EU) no. 536/2014, which also includes specific provisions on observational studies, both profit and non-profit.

Pharmacological observational studies are particularly important for the evaluation of the safety profile in normal conditions of use and on large numbers of subjects, for in-depth analysis of the efficacy in real life conditions, on the use of medicines, for the verification of the appropriateness of prescription and for pharmaco-economic evaluations.

The new Guideline:

  • applies to all categories of observational pharmacological clinical studies and responds to the objective of providing clear and precise indications on their correct classification and on the operational aspects to be taken into particular consideration in the regulatory activities of conduct and evaluation by the Ethics Committees.
  • updates and replaces the previous one, issued with AIFA directorial decision of 20 March 2008 and which no longer adequately reflected the needs of a sector that has undergone significant technical-scientific evolution in recent years.

In drafting the new Guideline, AIFA has paid particular attention to these renewal needs, which also involve:

  • the regulatory framework by incorporating the innovations arising from Regulation (EU) no. 536/2014
  • the national adaptation legislation
  • the recommendations of the interested stakeholders and
  • the evolution of the scientific context.

Source: AIFA

1 July
New consultation service of the AIFA Medicines database

AIFA has activated the new consultation service of the ‘AIFA Medicines’ medicinal products database.

  • The service allows a faster and more accurate search of documents and information on medicines authorised in Italy.
  • In addition to viewing and downloading the package leaflet and the Summary of Product Characteristics of medicines, citizens, healthcare professionals and companies may find information on the reimbursability of the medicine by the National Health Service (SSN), the supply regime and any shortages.

Source: AIFA

1 July
New consultation service of the AIFA Medicines database

AIFA has activated the new consultation service of the ‘AIFA Medicines’ medicinal products database.

  • The service allows a faster and more accurate search of documents and information on medicines authorised in Italy.
  • In addition to viewing and downloading the package leaflet and the Summary of Product Characteristics of medicines, citizens, healthcare professionals and companies may find information on the reimbursability of the medicine by the National Health Service (SSN), the supply regime and any shortages.

Source: AIFA

3 July
Guide to Fees for Human Products updated

This guide has been updated. Here, you can view the track changed (Jan 2024) and clean (Jul 2024) versions of the document.

The main changes appear to be in section 2 CLINICAL TRIAL AUTHORISATIONS.

Source: HPRA

Canada
11 September 2024
Authorization for a third party to file a regulatory activity on behalf of the manufacturer/sponsor

You can view/download the updated form here.

Source: Health Canada

19 August
Updated: Guidance Document: Certificates of Supplementary Protection

An updated version of the guidance document with the above title was published on 19 August 2024 and is effective from that date.

The document has been updated to clarify that the patent expiry date is the date on which the term of the patent expires under section 44 of the Patent Act and clarify current practices, including the definition of “filing date”

You can view the view the updates on page 5 of the document.

Source: Health Canada

14 August
Notice – Release of the final guidance document: “Switching from prescription to non-prescription status”

Health Canada released the final version of the guidance document: “Switching from prescription to non-prescription status”.

This document replaces the guidance document “Data requirements for switching medicinal ingredients from prescription to non-prescription status” and comes into effect 60 days after its posting i.e. on 14 October 2024.

This new version of the guidance document:

  • outlines a new process for prescription to natural health product switches;
  • provides more in-depth guidance on data requirements for switches; and
  • introduces a new template to be included in all switch submissions.

Source: Health Canada

19 August
Submit an eCTD v4.0 or Standardized Data Sample to the FDA

FDA would like to assist sponsors and applicants who have not previously submitted in eCTD v4.0 and offers a process to validate sample new eCTD v4.0 submissions and standardized study datasets.

  • You must have an NDA, IND, BLA, ANDA, or MF number and plan to submit an actual submission to the FDA within 12 months of your sample request.
  • Sample submissions are not considered official submissions and are not reviewed by FDA reviewers at any time. 

When testing is complete, FDA will provide you with feedback, highlighting the errors found during the processing of the sample submission.

Source: FDA

16 August
eCTD Submission Standards for eCTD v4.0 and Regional M1

The tables the links below list all the documents and supportive files applicable to eCTD submissions to CDER and CBER.

Submission Standards for eCTD v4.0

Validation Tools and Electronic Submission Validation Criteria in Use

Source: FDA

Brazil
29 August
Companies must submit a report on the marketing of medicines

From 2 September 2024, the Medicines Market Monitoring System (Sammed) will be available for sending marketing reports for the first half of 2024. 

  • Submissions can be made between September 2nd and 30th.
  • Reports sent after the deadline will not accepted.   
  • It is important to note that only companies that have submitted their Marketing Report to the Chamber for the Regulation of the Medicines Market (CMED), in accordance with Communiqué No. 11 of August 12, 2015, will be entitled to the maximum adjustment in drug prices in 2025.  
  • The report must be sent through the  Sammed system .
  • Guidelines for filling out and sending the report are available in the Marketing Report User Manual . 
  • Prior to submitting the report, it is important for companies to check all data to ensure that it is correct.
  • It is important to note that, according to CMED Resolution 2/2018, failure to submit the Marketing Report, or submitting it incompletely, inconsistently or after the deadline established by CMED, is considered a violation of the regulation of the pharmaceutical market.
  • Submitting incorrect data hinders the preparation of the Pharmaceutical Market Statistical Yearbook, as well as the market monitoring activities carried out by CMED.  

Source: Anvisa

13 August
New subject codes for registering biological products

From Monday 19th August, new subject codes will be made available for the registration of biological products.

  • The classification currently adopted considers the possible development and registration pathways: biological product and new biological product, development pathway by comparability and individual development pathway.
  • The new subjects however, will be specified according to the following categories: vaccines,
    • hyperimmune serums,
    • blood products,
    • biomedicines,
    • monoclonal antibodies,
    • live/attenuated/dead microorganisms,
    • industrialized allergenic products or
    • probiotics.

This new classification complies with the concepts and provisions of the standards that deal with the registration of biological products, namely: Collegiate Board Resolutions (RDCs) 55/2010, 187/2017, 194/2017 and 718/2022.

For better visualization, the change in codes on this page.

Source: Anvisa

5 August
Alert: increase in rejections of drug registration requests

Anvisa’s technical areas have identified deviations in registration requests in relation to

Both processes have directly impacted the increase in rejections of registration requests in Brazil.

Anvisa recommends that companies review their processes and procedures in order to adapt registration dossiers to current rules.

Source: Anvisa

11 July
Anvisa publishes SOP for the Medicines area

Anvisa has published a new standard operating procedure (SOP) for the Medicines area . 

  • Related to RDC 823/2023, the procedure provides risk-based guidelines to assess quality aspects in the registration and post-registration changes of synthetic and semi-synthetic medicines. 
  • The measure aims to reduce the number of requirements issued to companies seeking to regularize medicines.
  • It is estimated that the application of these new guidelines will result in a reduction of approximately 30% in the requirements carried out by the Agency’s Medicines area.
  • ANVISA is also developing similar procedures for other activities in the same area, which will be communicated in due course.
  • It should be noted that the document contains guidelines for employees to apply the new rules and is not subject to public consultation .   
  • You can view the procedure in full, via the Resolution 823/2023 page. The file is available in the “Related Documents ” section.

Source: Anvisa

10 July
Anvisa approves pilot project for digital leaflets for medicines

Anvisa directors approved, at the public meeting this Wednesday (10/7), a pilot project for the implementation of the drug package insert in Brazil.  

The project will be valid until December 31, 2026. The information collected and monitored during this period should serve as a subsidy for future definitive regulation on the subject.

The digital leaflet is an electronic version of the medication leaflet. It can be accessed by scanning a two-dimensional barcode (QR Code) on the packaging. The digital leaflet also allows access to additional information, such as videos, audios and other instructions that help with the proper use of the medication. 

Source: Anvisa

1 July
Learn how to consult similar interchangeable medicines

Since 2014, Anvisa has been publishing and updating the list of similar interchangeable drugs.

  • However, publishing and updating a list is not productive, as it quickly becomes outdated whenever a similar drug registration is published – which can happen almost every week!
  • In addition, the surveys needed to create and review the list require that an increasingly scarce Anvisa workforce be pulled from other activities, including responding to citizens and analyzing other registration requests.

Therefore, in compliance with art. 2, sole paragraph, of RDC 58/2014, the Agency has published new instructions (available at the link below) for obtaining the list of similar interchangeable drugs – through the Consultation system. It is important to note that the information obtained in this way is updated daily, which guarantees more current data than the publication of lists.

Source: Anvisa

3 September
New approved forms for clinical trials

The following two forms (one of which appears to be a sub-section of a form) have been approved for clinical trials:

Form nameForm function
Approved form–clinical trial (form titled Clinical Trial Notification)This is the the approved form for notifying the Secretary of a clinical trial, and the therapeutic goods covered by the trial, is the online form titled Clinical Trial Notification, accessed via the Clinical Trial Notification item, under the Clinical Trials heading, within the Create Applications & Submissions section of the sponsor portal of TGA Business Services.
Approved form–additional trial site (Change to Trial Details section of the online form titled Clinical Trial Notification)This is the the approved form for notifying the Secretary of an additional trial site is the Change to Trial Details section of the online form titled Clinical Trial Notification, accessed by selecting ‘Vary’ in relation to the relevant clinical trial in the Clinical Trials Repository link, under the Your TGA Information heading, within the sponsor portal of TGA Business Services

Source: TGA


30 July
Nitrosamine impurities acceptable intakes update

The TGA has published updated acceptable intake (AI) information for nitrosamine impurities in medicines consistent with recent EMA updated information. The changes include:

  • minor editorial amendments
  • increases to the AI limit for a nitrosamine impurity and
  • inclusion of recently internationally determined AI limits for numerous nitrosamine impurities in medicines.

Sponsors and manufacturers are expected to be familiar with the current acceptable intakes (AI) for nitrosamine impurities in medicines that the TGA consider acceptable. 

Source: TGA


Adoption of international scientific guidelines in Australia

Following a public consultation earlier this year on whether the TGA should adopt certain international scientific guidelines and a subsequent extensive internal and external consultation process, the TGA has adopted 13 international scientific guidelines which can be viewed on this page.

Whilst international scientific guidelines that are adopted in Australia are not mandated by legislation, they are intended to provide advice to applicants and/or sponsors to assist them in meeting legislative requirements.

Source: TGA

10 September
Minutes of 298th Meeting of the Central Licensing Board held on 26 July 2024

The following items are included in the minutes of the meeting:

1 Manufacturing requirements for Cephalosporin products

The Board discussed that the operations related to the manufacture, processing, and packing of cephalosporin should be performed in facilities segregated/separate from those used for other drug products for human use. This is due to their potential for causing allergic reactions.

  • Therefore, regarding new facilities, the Board has decided that cephalosporin shall only be manufactured, processed, and packed in separate and dedicated facilities.
  • The Board Authorized its chairman to issue the renewal of the Cephalosporin / Penicillin/ Penem Sections after receiving the undertaking for establishing a separate dedicated facility for Penicillin/cephalosporin/Carbapenem injectable within 2 years.

2 Establishment of A Registry of Technical Persons

The Central Licensing Board (CLB) of Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan (DRAP) has proposed the establishment of a registry of technical persons in the pharmaceutical industry, specifically focusing on production managers and Quality Control Managers.

  • The purpose of this registry is to facilitate the early approval of changes in technical personnel by providing a reliable database of qualified individuals in the field of pharmaceutical manufacturing in Pakistan.
  • The registry will be established through an online application system, where individuals with the required experience will be able to register themselves.
  • By maintaining a registry of technical persons, the CLB of DRAP aims to provide a centralized resource for the pharmaceutical industry.
  • This registry will enable companies to access a pool of qualified individuals, making it easier for them to recruit or find a suitable replacement for technical positions.
  • It will also help in regulating and monitoring the qualifications of technical personnel, ensuring the consistent quality of pharmaceuticals manufactured in Pakistan.

3 Late renewal Inspection for the renewal of the Drug Manufacturing License (DML)

The Central Licensing Board (CLB) has observed a significant delay in the conduct of inspections forthe renewal of the Drug Manufacturing License (DML).

  • This has resulted in a significant lapse of time without any inspection reports being received.
  • To address these concerns and ensure timely inspections, the CLB has implemented a new policy that requires all inspections to be conducted within six months after the constitution of the inspection panel.
  • This timeframe will ensure that the necessary inspections are undertaken promptly, minimizing any delays in the renewal of the DML.
  • The CLB also emphasizes that it is the responsibility of firms to cooperate fully and facilitate the inspection process.

Source: DRAP

2 September
Revision of Regulatory Fee Notification

DRAP has published a notification of fees update for 132 application types. You can view it here.

Source: DRAP

20 August
Administrative Order No. 2024-0012 – Prescribing the Rules and Regulations on the Registration o Pharmaceutical Products and Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Intended Solely for Export

You can view the above order here. The annexes accompanying the order can be viewed via the link below.

Source: FDA, The Philippines

20 August
Product Classification Application Form update

An updated version (August 2024) of the Product Classification Application Form – NPRA/413/01-3 is now available for download here.

Source: NPRA

7 August
Announcement to Product Registration Holders (PRHs): Revision of Categories and Criteria for New/Additional Indication Application – A Pilot Study

As the NPRA progresses towards implementing reliance1 throughout the product life cycle, it plans to expand the implementation of reliance to include new/additional indication (AI) applications beginning with a pilot project.

  • The pilot study, with a duration of 12 months, will be conducted starting on August 1, 2024.
  • For this pilot project, the NPRA has revised the current categories and their criteria as shown in Appendix I. 
  • A checklist to be completed by applicants is also provided.
  • As this is a pilot project, the proposed estimated timeline for AI reliance as shown in Appendix I represents the best commitment that the NPRA can make under the current circumstances to test out new processes and requirements.
  • In addition to the AI applications, the NPRA are handling a high volume of variation applications, all with the same staff and resources.

The NPRA is also working to streamline the variation process and seeks your assistance in properly planning and scheduling your variation submissions. This may help reduce its workload and consequently improve the timeline for new AI applications.

Applicants are advised to consult the respective head of sections if there are any queries.

1Note: Whilst no clear explanation has been provided by the NPRA on what ‘reliance’ means, it would appear that it means those cases where a new/additional indication (AI) being applied for has already been registered in any one (1) of the DCA’s reference agencies (EMA, UK MHRA, Swedish Medical Products Agency, ANSM France, US FDA, TGA Australia, Health Canada, PMDA Japan and Swissmedic) i.e. meaning that the NPRA will ‘rely’ on an assessment already undertaken by one or more of the above international regulatory agencies for its local assessment of a new/additional indication (AI) application.

Source: NPRA

26 June
Registration Application Submitted via Facilitated Registration Pathway (FRP) – FAQs

An FAQ had been posted for the above pathway. You can view it here.

Source: NPRA

7 August
Countries named under the Rule 101 of New Drugs and Clinical Trial Rules 2019 concerning new drug approvals

As per rule 101 of the New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules 2019, CDSCO, with the approval of the central government may specify the name of countries from time to time, for consideration of waiver of local clinical trial for approval of new drugs under Chapter X and for grant of permission for conduct of clinical trial under chapter 5 of said rules.

See letter of 7 August 2024 published with named countries here.

Source: CDSCO

4 June
Revision of CDSCO Guidance for Industry on pharmacovigilance requirements for Human vaccines

CDSCO has published Version 2.0 of the draft guidance with the title above. You can comment on it (with valid justification) until 13 June 2024 by emailing psur.drugs@cdsco.nic.in

Source: CDSCO

10 September
New standard on safety requirements for medical devices comes into force

On 4 September, Collegiate Board Resolution (RDC) 848/2024 (replacing RDC 546/2021) came into force.

  • It provides for the essential safety and performance requirements applicable to medical devices and in vitro diagnostic (IVD) medical devices.
  • It updates the information required to demonstrate the compliance of medical devices, with  in vitro diagnostic medical devices also being included in this new version .

According to the standard, products must meet the following requirements amongst others: 

  • be designed to meet the intended purpose, in accordance with the indicated conditions of use
  • be safe
  • function as intended by the manufacturer
  • have acceptable risks, considering the benefits;
  • must not compromise the clinical condition or patient safety.

The following must be supported by relevant clinical data obtained through an assessment of high-risk medical devices (classes III and IV) that verifies the existence of a favorable risk-benefit ratio based on scientific evidence.

  • The indication
  • intended use
  • performance and safety

The information must take into account the product life cycle and risk management.

The changes aim to ensure greater safety and effectiveness for medical devices and IVD medical devices, in line with the global scenario and technological and scientific developments.

Source: Anvisa

2 September
UDI-Anvisa Project (Unique Device  Identification)

In August, Anvisa met with companies participating in Pilot #1 of the UDI-Anvisa Project (Unique Device Identification). Companies had the opportunity to share their perceptions and contributions about the system being tested by the Agency.

Phase of ProjectDuration or completion Notes
Phase 1Completion due End Sept 2024This first version of the system will have the following basic features: access to the system, a web-based UDI data registration form, a query system (internal and external) with historical traceability, third-party user management and mass data registration (in XLM format – Extensible Markup Language ) by uploading files via the system interface.
Phase 2Oct 2024 – First half of 2025New functionalities will be implemented. The plan is to register UDI data in bulk from machine to machine, in addition to the functionality of mass registration by manual upload to the system, and to provide an API (application programming interface) for external queries, both using the HL7/FHIR communication standard.

Following completion of phase 1 of the project, the system will only be rolled out to the public after the publication of the normative instruction (IN) provided for in 
Collegiate Board Resolution (RDC) 591/2021 .

After the publication of the IN, the deadlines for the mandatory transmission of UDI data to Anvisa will begin, as defined in art. 15 of Collegiate Board Resolution (RDC) 591/2021 (amended by RDC 884/2024).

Source: Anvisa

28 August
Launch of new system module of e-Notivisa to report adverse events for medical devices

Anvisa will hold a webinar (aimed at companies and the public) on 2 September to present and launch the new e-Notivisa module.

  • The system will start receiving notifications of adverse events and technical complaints related to medical devices (health products).
  • With this new feature, citizens will have an even more efficient tool to report any incidents involving in vitro diagnostic products , medical-dental materials and equipment, among others.
  • The new module simplifies the reporting process, making it more intuitive and accessible, in addition to enabling companies to respond directly to citizens. 
  • The system also offers a more user-friendly interface and innovative technologies to automate the detection of signals and company responses through artificial intelligence mechanisms, intelligent searches and data science elements.
  • The new module joins the cosmetics, sanitizing and hygiene products modules, which are already fully operational. Learn more about e-Notivisa below.

Source: Anvisa

6 September
Guidance updated: Notify MHRA about a clinical investigation for a medical device

This section Updated ‘In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices (IVDs)’ section of this guidance has guidance has been updated. No further specifics are provided.

Source: MHRA

5 August
Guidance updated: Notify MHRA about a clinical investigation for a medical device

This guidance has been updated with the addition of a new section Regulatory advice meetings added.

The MHRA Clinical investigations team can offer a comprehensive device regulatory advice meeting as well as provide guidance on navigating the regulatory landscape.

To request a regulatory advice meeting please contact the Head of clinical investigations – mark.grumbridge@mhra.gov.uk.

Source: MHRA

2 August
Guidance updated: Register medical devices to place on the market

This following sections of this guidance have been updated to to reflect changes to the registration system:

  • Account Management Reference Guide
  • Device Registration Reference Guide

Source: MHRA

3 July
Guidance updated – Notify MHRA about a clinical investigation for a medical device

This guidance has been updated as follows:

  • to clarify the fees and payment process
  • addition of guidance on early terminations and temporary halts in GB and NI and
  • clarification that Annex XVI applications cannot be accepted in GB.

You can view the updated guidance at the link below.

Source: MHRA

28 August

Consultation: Draft Guidance – Regulatory changes for medical devices containing medicinal substances or materials of animal, microbial or recombinant origin

This guidance :

  • explains the new regulatory requirements for medical devices containing medicinal, microbial, recombinant, or animal origin substances effective from 1 July 2024.
  • helps sponsors interpret the new classification rule, conformity assessment requirements and transition arrangements.

covers the background, highlights key changes, and outlines the steps for sponsors and manufacturers to comply with the new requirements. Additionally, it provides examples to demonstrate how to apply the requirements in practice.

Your input is important to ensure the draft guidance outlines the background, key changes, and explains the steps for sponsors and manufacturers to comply with the new requirements.  

Your feedback will inform any changes to the guidance prior to publication on the TGA website. 

You can provide your feedback via this link.

Consultation start date: 28 August 2024

Consultation end date: 9 October 2024

Source: TGA

26 August
Consultation on Guidance on Change Management Program (CMP) for Software as a Medical Device (SaMD)

The Medical Devices Cluster (MDC) has released a draft of Guidance on Change Management Program (CMP) for SaMD for stakeholders’ consultation.

  • The document describes the regulatory requirements and procedures for CMP submission.
  • CMP is a new optional regulatory pathway specifically for SaMD that is incorporated into HSA’s Premarket Product Registration and Change Notification (CN) processes, which also introduces the concept of Pre-specified changes.

Stakeholders are invited to provide feedback on the Guidance on Change Management Program (CMP) for SaMD.

Please email your feedback using the prescribed feedback form to HSA_MD_INFO@hsa.gov.sg. State “Feedback on Guidance on CMP for SaMD” in the email subject header.

Here, you can view Briefing webinar slides: Industry Briefing on CMP for SaMD_slides

Consultation start date: 26 August 2024

Consultation end date: 21 October 2024

19 August
Consultation: IVD Medical Devices – Common specifications

This consultation concerns a draft implementing regulation amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1107 laying down common specifications
for certain class D in vitro diagnostic medical devices in accordance with Regulation
(EU) 2017/746 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

The Commission also published an Annex detailing qualitative and quantitative requirements for Nucleic Acid Amplification Technique (NAT) devices for detecting hepatitis E and several arboviruses.

For class D devices intended for detection of hepatitis E virus, Toxoplasma gondii, Plasmodium spp., as well as four types of arboviruses (Chikungunya virus, dengue virus, West Nile virus and Zika virus), harmonised standards do not exist as regards certain requirements of Annex I to Regulation (EU) 2017/746, and there is a need to address public health concerns, as the risk associated with the use of those devices is significant for public health and patient safety. It is therefore appropriate to add common specifications for those devices in respect of those requirements.

This draft act is open for feedback for 4 weeks (between the dates stated below. Feedback will be taken into account for finalising this initiative. You can provide feedback via the link provided on this page.

Consultation start date: 19 August 2024

Consultation end date: 16 September 2024

Source: European Commission

13 August
UDI issuing entities update

Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/2120 of 30 July 2024 renewed the designations of the current four issuing entities for a further period of five years, until 27 June 2029.

See the UDI HRI & AIDC formats and basic UDI-DI formats used by each issuing entity via links on this page. This content is based on input from the issuing entities and will be regularly updated.

Source: European Commission

7 August
Consultation Australian Medical Device Essential Principles – Part 2: Proposed alignment with the European Regulation

The Australian (AUS) Essential Principles set out the safety and performance characteristics of medical devices in Schedule 1 of the Therapeutic Goods (Medical Devices) Regulations 2002.

This consultation seeks to confirm views, on where appropriate, the AUS Essential Principles should align with the GSPR of the European Regulation 2017/745 on medical devices (MDR) and Regulation 2017/746 for in vitro diagnostic medical devices (IVDR), collectively referred to as the EU Regulations.

There are two documents, the Consultation paper and Attachment 1 available at the bottom of this page. Please read both the documents and keep them available for reference when responding to the survey.

The consultation paper provides:

  • background and other information related to the consultation
  • all of the questions included in the online survey.

Attachment 1 includes:

  • each proposed change for the AUS Essential Principles
  • a legislative comparison between the AUS Essential Principles and the equivalent EU GSPRs.

You can respond to the consultation here.

Consultation start date: 7 August 2024

Consultation end date: 16 October 2024

Source: TGA

1 August
Online resource for information on reprocessing of single-use medical devices

The FDA introduced online resources to provide information about reprocessing single-use medical devices for health care facilities and FAQs. The FDA remains dedicated to providing resources to help health care facilities establish, implement, or improve their quality assurance programs related to reprocessing single-use medical devices.

Source: FDA

1 July
Consultation Good machine learning practice for medical device development – Guiding Principles

The algorithms that AI technologies use, can learn from the real world to potentially improve a product’s performance.

  • This document establishes a common set of principles for the community to promote the development of safe, effective, and high-quality medical devices that incorporate AI.
  • The ten guiding principles for Good Machine Learning Practice (GMLP) presented in the document are a call to action to the following to further advance GMLP:
    • international standards organizations,
    • international regulators
    • other collaborative bodies

You can respond to the consultation via the response template.

Consultation start date: 1 July 2024

Consultation end date: 30 August 2024

Source: IMDRF

11 September
Questions and Answers regarding co-processed excipients used in solid oral dosage forms (H & V)

While co-processed excipients (CoPEs) can offer benefits such as improved functionality, they also introduce additional risks compared to using individual excipients.

The use of CoPEs in pharmaceutical formulations can present higher risks due to several factors: e.g.

  • complexity of composition (inherent variability, unpredictable interactions),
  • quality control (challenges for analytical methods, batch to batch consistency),
  • formulation development (complexity of optimisation studies,
  • challenges with scaling up production) and
  • stability issues due to combination of different materials.

These Q&As aim to harmonise and clarify dossier requirements for CoPEs using a risk-based approach; the Q&As are applicable to human and veterinary solid oral dosage forms.

Comments should be provided using this EUSurvey form.

Consultation start date: 11 September 2024

Consultation end date: 31 December 2024

Source: EMA

25 July
Guideline on the chemistry of active substances

This guideline replaces “Note for guidance on chemistry of new active substances” (CPMP/QWP/130/96, Rev 1) and “Chemistry of active substances” (3AQ5a).

The purpose of this guideline is to set out the type of information required for the manufacture and control of active substances (existing or new chemical entities) used in a medicinal product.

  • The differences in requirements for new or existing active substances are clarified in the relevant paragraphs of the guideline where applicable.
  • For the purposes of this guideline, an existing active substance is one that has been used in a finished product authorised previously within the European Union.
  • This approach is consistent with the definition of new active substance in the Notice to Applicants, Volume 2A, Chapter 1, Annex I: a chemical (…) substance not previously authorised as a medicinal product in the European Union.
  • This guideline is not applicable to herbal, biological, biotechnological products, radiopharmaceuticals and radiolabelled products.
  • The guideline does not apply to contents of submissions during the clinical research stages of drug development.
  • Nevertheless, the development principles presented in this guideline are important to consider during the investigational stages.

Comments should be provided using this EUSurvey form.

Consultation start date: 25 July 2024

Consultation end date: 31 January 2025

22 July
Draft Guideline on the Development and Manufacture of Oligonucleotides

This guideline addresses specific aspects regarding the manufacturing process, characterisation, specifications and analytical control for synthetic oligonucleotides which are not covered in the Guideline on the Chemistry of Active Substances (EMA/454576/2016) or Chemistry of Active Substances for Veterinary Medicinal Products (EMA/CVMP/QWP/707366/2017). It also contains requirements and considerations related to conjugation, to active substance in solution, to medicinal product development, to oligonucleotide generics development, to oligonucleotide personalised medicine approaches and to clinical trial applications (human products only).

The purpose of this guideline is to set out the type of information required for the development, manufacture and control of synthetic oligonucleotides (existing or new chemical entities) used in a medicinal product, in the context of obtaining a marketing authorisation. There is also a chapter on the 70 requirements for clinical trial applications.

Comments should be provided using this EUSurvey form.

Consultation start date: 22 July 2024

Consultation end date: 31 January 2025

Source: EMA

12 April
Draft Guideline on the requirements for demonstrating therapeutic equivalence between orally inhaled products (OIP) for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)

This guideline is the 2nd revision of the CHMP Guideline formerly called “Guideline on the requirements for clinical documentation for orally inhaled products (OIP) including the requirements for demonstration of therapeutic equivalence between two inhaled products for use in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in adults and for use in the treatment of asthma in children and adolescents”. It addresses the requirements for demonstration of therapeutic equivalence (TE) between orally inhaled products containing the same active moiety(ies).

Comments should be provided using this EUSurvey form.

Start of public consultation: 12 April 2024

End of public consultation: 30 October 2024

Source: EMA

Draft Guideline on the pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal medicinal products

This guideline is the first revision of the guideline on pharmaceutical quality of inhalation and nasal 5 products (EMEA/CHMP/QWP/49313/2005 Corr).

The main aim of the first revision is to consolidate the information available in the previous guidance documents, the related published questions and answers, also taking into consideration recent advancements in the field, common practice and new regulations, including the medical device regulation.

Comments should be provided using this EUSurvey form.

Start of public consultation: 12 April 2024

End of public consultation: 31 October 2024

Source: EMA

22 August
Proposed updates to the Guideline on the Regulation of Therapeutic Products in New Zealand: Clinical Trials

This consultation is aimed at the following:

  • pharmaceutical companies
  • health care professional organisations and individuals involved in conducting clinical trials in New Zealand.
  • people who participate in clinical trials or with an interest in clinical trials regulation

Medsafe is seeking your feedback on changes to the Guideline on the Regulation of Therapeutic Products in New Zealand: Part 11: Clinical trials – regulatory approval and good clinical practice requirements and two new guidance documents which are proposed to be used alongside the Guideline:

  • Considerations for First-In-Human (FIH) and Early Phase Clinical Trials; and
  • Clinical Trial Safety Monitoring and Reporting for Investigational Products (Medicines and Medical Devices).

Updates are proposed to:

  • Incorporate new or updated legislation and relevant guidance issued in New Zealand and overseas;
  • Reflect changes to best practice for the design and conduct of clinical trials (eg, patient involvement in study design); and
  • Provide more clarity to those involved in conducting clinical trials on their obligations.

You can access the relevant documents and respond to the consultation via the link below.

Consultation start date: 23 August 2024

Consultation end date: 27 October 2024

Source: Medsafe

9 August
Draft guideline – Good practices of national regulatory authorities in 4 implementing the collaborative registration 5 procedures for medical products

The WHO has issued a draft working document of a guideline with the above title, for comments.

This guideline is intended to serve as the national regulatory authorities’ (NRAs) best practices model for implementing collaborative registration procedures (CRP) in their overall marketing authorization system for medical products.

It should be read in conjunction with the full text of the collaborative procedures (2,3,2). The document also outlines the recommended approaches a NRA should take to process different types of applications, based on prior decisions and documentary evidence from the World Health Organization (WHO) Prequalification Team (PQT) or reference authorities.

The objectives of the document are to:

  • describe the practical steps for NRAs to implement the collaborative procedure for prequalified products and stringent regulatory authorities (SRAs)-approved products; and
  • provide a resource for NRAs to effectively and efficiently implement collaborative reliance-based procedures for medical products, including vaccines.

You can view/ download the draft here.

Consultation start date: 29 July 2024

Consultation end date: 20 September 2024

Source: WHO

2 August
Consultation on draft guidance on expanded access clinical trials

Expanded access clinical trials, are investigations that can sometimes help to provide access to novel therapies before they have been authorized for sale by Health Canada. This could include therapies for serious or life-threatening conditions where authorized drugs may be limited for certain patients (for example, related to oncology, rare diseases and some mental health disorders).

  • Health Canada has developed a draft guidance document on expanded access clinical trials.
  • This draft guidance document explains the regulatory requirements for expanded access clinical trials. These requirements are supported by Part C, Division 5 of the regulations, entitled “Drugs for Clinical Trials Involving Human Subjects”.
  • Health Canada has authorized a number of expanded access clinical trials, including trials that are part of international, multi-site expanded access programs. However, the number of clinical trial sites opened and participants enrolled in Canada has been limited. This document provides additional information about how expanded access clinical trials are managed in Canada.
  • This draft guidance document is for
    • sponsors
    • health care providers
    • potential participants who are interested in, involved in or participating in expanded access clinical trials involving sites in Canada.
  • Health Canada is looking for your feedback on the draft guidance.

After the consultation period ends on October 31, 2024, Health Canada will review all written submissions. Your comments will be made public in a “what was heard” report and will be considered when the guidance is finalized. This final version will be developed as part of Health Canada’s broader clinical trial modernization initiative.

Consultation start date: 2 August 2024

Consultation end date: 31 October 2024

Source: Health Canada

24 July
Consultation: Release for Draft (Step 2) ICH Guideline, ICH M14

Please use the ICH template for public consultations to send in your comments.

Consultation start date: 24 July 2024

Consultation end date: 22 October 2024

Sources: Health Canada, ICH

5 September

The EU, UK, US and Israel have signed the first international treaty on artificial intelligence in a move that aims to prevent misuses of the technology, such as spreading misinformation or using biased data to make decisions.

  • The treaty, called the framework convention on artificial intelligence, was drawn up by the Council of Europe.
  • Under the legally binding agreement, signatories must implement safeguards against any threats posed by AI to human rights, democracy and the rule of law. 
  • The treaty states that AI systems must comply with a set of principles including: protecting personal data; non-discrimination; safe development; and human dignity

Source: The Guardian

5 September
Harnessing the use AI via the use of large language models (LLMs) in medicines regulation

EMA and the HMA have published high-level principles and recommendations for all staff across the European medicines regulatory network (EMRN) using large language models (LLMs) in their work.

  • The guiding principles cover various aspects of using LLMs, from ensuring safe input of data, to applying critical thinking and cross-checking outputs, to knowing whom to consult when concerns arise.
  • Additionally, the principles encourage regulatory agencies to make efforts to support their staff in using LLMs. This includes defining governance on the use of LLMs, specifying permitted use cases, providing training and monitoring risks.
  • The guiding principles:
    • are one of the deliverables of the multiannual AI workplan to 2028 by EMA and the Heads of Medicines Agencies (HMA). This workplan guides EMA and the EMRN in their use of AI, maximising the benefits while managing the risks, and facilitating information sharing.
    • are a living document that will be regularly updated, and EMA will introduce it to the network in a webinar on 13 September 2024. This is one of the various events and information sharing opportunities organised in the context of the AI workplan.

Source: EMA

1 August

Today, the European Artificial Intelligence Act (AI Act), the world’s first comprehensive regulation on artificial intelligence, enters into force.

  • The AI Act is designed to ensure that AI developed and used in the EU is trustworthy, with safeguards to protect people’s fundamental rights.
  • The regulation aims to establish a harmonised internal market for AI in the EU, encouraging the uptake of this technology and creating a supportive environment for innovation and investment.

You can view a Q&A on AI here. and a webinar from Qserve on the impact of the EU AI Act on Medical Device and IVD Manufacturers here.

Sources: European Commission, Qserve

European AI Act published
12 July

Today, Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 June 2024 laying down harmonised rules on artificial intelligence (the “AI Act”) was published in the Official Journal of the EU.

The AI Act will enter into force 20 days following its publication. It shall apply from 2 August 2026.

However:

(a) Chapters I and II shall apply from 2 February 2025;

(b) Chapter III Section 4, Chapter V, Chapter VII and Chapter XII and Article 78 shall apply from 2 August 2025, with the exception of Article 101;

(c) Article 6(1) and the corresponding obligations in this Regulation shall apply from 2 August 2027

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Source: huntoak.com

12 September
The future of European competitiveness

This comprehensive report (commissioned by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen) on the future of European competitiveness was published on 9 September. The report analyses the competitive landscape that the EU is facing and sets out proposals to improve Europe’s competitiveness. Section 9 on pages 187 – 199, dedicated to pharma is well worth reading.

The root causes of the EUs emerging competitive gap are listed as follows:

  1. Lesser and fragmented public R&D investment in the EU
  2. Lesser private R&D investment in the EU and a weaker supporting environment
  3. A slow and complex regulatory medicines framework in the EU which includes:
    • Approval times for new medicines in the EU/EEA under procedures performed by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) are longer than those of regulatory agencies in other regions
    • In addition, industry stakeholders report that compared to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the EMA offers less opportunities for direct, structured interaction on scientific advice
    • Once a new medicine has been approved by the EMA, there are 27 different procedures to decide on national pricing and reimbursement
    • One critical element of these decisions is the national Health Technology Assessment (HTA), which commonly informs reimbursement decisions at the national level
  4. The complex emergence of a European Health Data Space (EHDS)

Amongst the proposals to address the key root causes driving the EU’s emerging competitiveness gap for pharmaceuticals are the following:

  1. Maximise the impact of the EU Health Data Space
  2. Streamline the set-up and management of multi-country trials in the EU
  3. Expedite access to markets

Source: European Commission

21 August
The ICH E11A Guideline Clinical Investigation of medicines in the paediatric population reaches Step 4 of the ICH Process

The E11A Guideline provides:

  • recommendations and promotes international harmonisation of paediatric extrapolation to support the development and authorisation of paediatric medicines. The E11A Guideline 
  • a framework for using extrapolation to support paediatric drug development.
    • The framework describes an iterative process for understanding the existing information available, the gaps in information needed to inform development, and ways to generate additional information when required and recommends approaches to assessing factors that influence the determination of similarity of disease, drug pharmacology, and response to treatment between a reference and paediatric target population.
    • In addition, it discusses how the characteristics of the disease, drug pharmacology and response to treatment may influence this determination. 

Further information is available on this page.

Source: ICH

31 July
The ICH M13A Guideline reaches Step 4 of the ICH Process

The ICH M13A Guideline and associated Q&As on “Bioequivalence for Immediate-Release Solid Oral Dosage Forms” reached Step 4 of the ICH Process on 23 July 2024.

This Guideline provides recommendations on conducting bioequivalence studies during both development and post approval phases for orally administered immediate-release solid oral dosage forms. The Q&A document is intended to provide additional clarification and improve harmonisation of bioequivalence study design and data analysis.

Step Introductory Training Presentation has also been developed by the M13 EWG to summarise the content of the Guideline.

Further information is available on the this page.

You can read more about the ICH process in this blog post.

Source: ICH

11 July
European Pharmacopoeia abolishes rabbit testing

At its 179th meeting in June 2024, the European Pharmacopoeia Commission adopted the removal of the rabbit test from all regulations.

  • The revised texts will be published in Supplement 11.8 of the European Pharmacopoeia and will enter into force on July 1, 2025.
  • This means that the use of the RPT will no longer be required in any text of the European Pharmacopoeia.
  • These innovations represent significant progress in animal welfare and have a strong global signaling effect.
  • This decision sets new ethical standards and promotes the development of innovative in vitro alternatives such as the Monocyte Activation Test (MAT).

Source: Swissmedic

9 July
Call to Action issued by concerned stakeholders on the Implementation of the EU Joint Clinical Assessment for ATMPs

The new EU Joint Clinical Assessment (JCA) will become an additional barrier for patient access to transformative advanced therapies if the HTA Coordination Group does not modernize its approach to evaluating these medicines, warned 30 not-for-profit organisations, including patient groups, scientific societies, research foundations and medical institutes, in a Call to Action announced today.

  • The organisations urged all those involved in the JCA to recognize and use all types of available clinical evidence, including single-arm trials and real-world evidence, in the assessment of Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products (ATMPs), which include cell and gene therapies.
  • Recognising that randomised control trials are often unfeasible and unethical for ATMPs, which often target rare or ultra rare diseases, they called on the EU HTA Coordination Group to:
    • Revise the JCA methodological guidance to avoid discrediting evidence from single-arm trials
    • Take a more pragmatic approach to running JCAs of ATMPs by using real-world data to fill evidence gaps

Source: alliancerm.org

You can read more about Health Technology assessment in this blog post.