European Court cases involving Supplementary Protection Certificates

Last updated: 28 April 2025

To view updates, click on the ‘+’ sign below.

DateUpdate
28 April 2025Added link to and explanatory article by Hogan Lovells on case concerning AstraZeneca vs Glenmark concerning dapagliflozin in the ‘Articles on the case’ section of the table.
11 April 2025Added further details on case concerning AstraZeneca vs Glenmark concerning dapagliflozin in the ‘Outcome’ section of the table.
10 Apr 2025Added details on case concerning AstraZeneca vs Glenmark concerning dapaglilozin.

The table below is an attempt to present some court cases involving Supplementary Protection Certificates.

  • Where a blog post (concerning a particular case) has been published on the Pharmavibes blog, a link is provided in the ‘Outcomes’ column in the table below.
  • For other cases, brief information on the outcome of a case is provided in the ‘Outcomes’ column and links to an article(s) concerning a case are provided in the ‘Articles on the case column’ of the table.

You can read more about Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) and Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) manufacturing waivers in this blog post.

Case No/CourtParties concernedWhat the case is aboutOutcome dateOutcomeArticle(s) on the case
Court of appealAstraZeneca vs GlenmarkThe underlying dispute involves Glenmark’s challenge to the validity of AZ’s SPC  which protects dapagliflozin, the active ingredient in ForxigaOngoing

AstraZeneca (AZ) successfully appealed a UK High Court decision, preventing Glenmark from launching a generic version of its diabetes drug Forxiga (dapagliflozin) while patent validity is being assessed
Outcome so far
On 9 April the UK Court of Appeal awarded AstraZeneca (AZ) an interim injunction keeping Glenmark’s dapagliflozin (dapa) off the UK market until the form of order hearing in the parallel validity action.
The interim injunction could remain in place until June, or for a longer (or shorter) period of time depending on the timing of the validity action.

Source: hoganlovells.com
Court of Appeal hands down reasons for awarding AZ an interim injunction in the UK against Glenmark’s generic dapagliflozin for type II diabetes

Helen Poulson et al, 24 April 2025, Hogan Lovells
Court of appeal (Civil Division) on appeal from the high court of justice (UK)Merck Serono S.A. Appellant – and – The Comptroller-General of Patents, Designs, and Trade MarksSPC protection for second medical useJudgment 28 January 2025The appeal was dismissed.
This means that pharmaceutical companies cannot obtain UK supplementary protection certificates (SPCs) for medicinal products for which a second medical use has been found where those products have already been the subject of a marketing authorisation issued by regulators, the Court of Appeal in England and Wales has confirmed.1

1. UK court shuts door on ‘second medical use’ SPCs, Alasdhair McDonald et al, 4 February 2025, Pinsent Masons
UK court shuts door on ‘second medical use’ SPCs, Alasdhair McDonald et al, 4 February 2025, Pinsent Masons

SPC protection for second medical uses post-Brexit – UK Court of Appeal clarifies test, Laura Whiting et al, 14 February 2025, Freshfields
Business Court Brussels (Belgium)Amgen vs Samsung Bioepis NL BVSPC manufacturing waiverJudgement 23 Dec 2024The President, hearing this case as in summary proceedings: —
——etc.

Declares Amgen’s claim regarding compliance with the notification requirement and -conditions admissible but unfounded and dismisses it; —

Declares Amgen’s claim relating to the unfair commercial practices inadmissible and dismisses it; —
———–etc.
SPC manufacturing waiver ruling offers legal clarity, say experts, Charlotte Weekes et al, 22 January 2025, Pinsent Masons
Case C-119/22 and C-149/22 MSD vs Teva

MSD Vs Clonmel
Conditions under which SPCs may be granted for combination products in the EU6 June 2024 (opinion)

19 December 2024 (judgement)
Blog post
The Regional Court Munich , Germany

Janssen Biotech vs FormyconSPC manufacturing waiver

Blog post
UK high courtHalozyme Inc. vs the UK Intellectual Property OfficeQuestion whether one of the ingredients in a combination product is an active ingredient.16 Dec 2024Blog post
Preliminary ruling on Case C‑181/24
by the CJEU
Genmab A/S vs Budapest High Court, HungarySPC application rejected on the basis that the subsequent MA was not the first MA.16 July 2024Blog post
Case C-473/22Mylan vs GileadJudgement 11 January 2024 Blog post